• Paused
    Veterans Day
    Airport Workers
    Veterans Cemetery Districts
    Federal Workers
    Irrigation Districts
    Wastewater Treatment Workers
    Water Districts
    Superior Courts
    Road Workers
    Police Officers
    Member Login


    Not registered yet?
    Click Here to sign-up

    Forgot Your Login?
    Contact Elected Officials!
    Important Links
    Merit Systems Protection Board
    National Labor Relations Board
    Federal Labor Relations Board
    Office of Special Counsel
    Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
    Brothers on The Line
    Public Employee Relations Board/California State Mediation & Concilliation Service
    Laborers Int'l Union of N. America
    LiUNA Womens Caucus
    Laborers Health and Welfare Trust
    LiUNA Industrial Pension Plan
    Coalition of Labor Union Women
    Goyette & Assoc. Attorneys
    Minahan & Muther PC Attorneys
    Novey, Tribuiano, Yamada, LLP
    Monterey CLC
    Sacramento CLC
    LiUNA Pacific SW Region
    South Bay CLC
    San Francisco CLC
    California Labor Federation
    Southern California Laborers
    GEM Monterey Employees Assoc.
    Peace Officers Res. Assn. of CA
    Perry Advertising
    North State Labor Federation
    Five Counties CLC
    Site Search
    Site Map
    RSS Feeds
    Action Center
  • Backers to hold off on pension ballot measures this year
    Posted On: Jan 19, 2016

     (Don Bartletti / Los Angeles Times)
     Melanie Mason Contact Reporter
    Proponents of a pair of initiatives to curb retirement benefits for public employees said Monday they will not go forward with their ballot measures this year.
    Instead, former San Diego Councilman Carl DeMaio and former San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed said they will seek to qualify their measures in 2018, when they believe they'll face a more favorable political landscape.
    "We need pension reform to protect our education system and vital public services from these fast-growing burdens," DeMaio, a Republican, and Reed, a Democrat, wrote in an email to supporters. "Although our polling today shows continued strong public support for pension reform, we believe 2018 will provide an even better environment for substantial reform as rising retirement costs further squeeze their schools and local agencies budgets."
    Join the conversation on Facebook >>
    DeMaio and Reed filed two ballot measures last year aiming to shrink public employee pensions: One would have required voter approval for defined-benefit pensions for new workers after 2019, and the other would have limited what the government could pay toward new employees' retirement benefits.
    1:50 p.m.: In an earlier version of this post, the caption said DeMaio was a congressman. He is a former Republican congressional candidate.
    Labor unions were quick to voice their opposition to the proposals and were expected to spend heavily against them.
    DeMaio, in an interview Monday, said the measures' backers decided to hold off this year in part because they were awaiting the result of a U.S. Supreme Court case on mandatory union fees. If justices decide to strike down such fees, it could deal a major blow to labor unions.
    "If labor unions aren't able to spend unlimited amounts of money, that certainly heightens the chance of [pension] reform," DeMaio said.
    He also said instability in the stock market could make their proposals more palatable.
    "We believe that as the markets begin to show distress, taxpayers will see it's not fun seeing their 401(k)s go down and then have to turn around and write bailout checks for government pension programs," DeMaio said.
    See the most-read stories this hour >>
    This isn't the first time supporters of pension overhaul have delayed their path to the ballot. In 2012, a Republican-led group abandoned its initiative campaign; in 2014, Reed pulled his own statewide initiative. In both cases, proponents accused Atty. Gen. Kamala Harris of crafting a politically slanted summary that would dissuade voters from the measures.
    Reed sued Harris over her title and summary of his measure in 2014. A judge ruled her description was fair.
    Dave Low, chairman of Californians for Retirement Security, a coalition of labor groups opposing the proposals, said Reed and DeMaio's efforts "failed because they were too extreme, would have cost taxpayers billions of dollars, and would have destabilized our state's two retirement systems, CalPERS and CalSTRS."
    "We are skeptical that donors will have any confidence in these two failed politicians who have repeatedly bungled efforts to put their poorly written efforts to gut retirement security for millions of Californians on the ballot," Low said in a statement. "They can be assured that any scheme they cook up for 2018 will meet the same fate of their previous efforts because we will fight it with our full arsenal."

  • UPEC - LiUNA Local 792

    Copyright © 2021.
    All Rights Reserved.

    Powered By UnionActive

    460308 hits since Dec 09, 2013

  • Top of Page image